home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Collection of Internet
/
Collection of Internet.iso
/
infosrvr
/
doc
/
www_talk.arc
/
000073_timbl _Tue Mar 24 11:23:31 1992.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1992-11-30
|
1KB
Return-Path: <timbl>
Received: by nxoc01.cern.ch (NeXT-1.0 (From Sendmail 5.52)/NeXT-2.0)
id AA19187; Tue, 24 Mar 92 11:23:31 GMT+0100
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 92 11:23:31 GMT+0100
From: timbl (Tim Berners-Lee)
Message-Id: <9203241023.AA19187@ nxoc01.cern.ch >
Received: by NeXT Mailer (1.62)
To: jfg@bernd.cern.ch (Jean-Francois Groff)
Subject: Mapping names in the server
Cc: www-talk@nxoc01.cern.ch
Ed,
As JF says, you can map logical document names to real file names in the server by
means of the rule file. We didn't put the rule file into the client,
because we didn't want the start-up time to be long. Also,
we wanted a W3 document name to be followable by anyone, not just
the few who have picked up the latest gems of rule file titbits.
(There were a couple of starts missing from JF's example, which should have been
map rfc:* file://ftp.nisc.sri.com/rfc/*
)
Actually the current distributed server expects the output of the rule file
to be a local filename. You would have to modify it to expect a w3 address.
In the long term, a name service should exist to translate
name-service:/org/isoc/rfc/959
into say file://ftp.nisc.sri.com/rfc/rfc959.ps and .txt. As noone seems to
want to extend the DNS, it looks as though x500 is the best bet. There was
some discussion on this at the IETF, though it'll be a while before x500 is all
over.
Tim